Every once in a while I would get an urge to throw up a quick quiz on my Clyde’s Stuff Facebook Page. Sometimes they were fairly easy. Others were real stumpers. I never could tell which would be which.
Generally when I think up these questions, it’s while watching a film or just browsing through my library. I’ve been trying to get a copy of the film from which I made these screen captures and finally succeeded in a roundabout way. I try to make these quizzes as offbeat as I can and not the usual run of the mill bull crap the now proliferates your timeline on Facebook like a case of the Zimbio bubonic plague.
The actress in this scene deserved an Oscar. Well, she would have deserved one if they had a category for best actress being dead while your corpse melts in phony assed flames that come no where near you. But the film was a monumental work of art. I say that because it carries a 5.2 rating on the IMDB whereas I wouldn’t have given it more than a 2.2. If that much. So there must be some artsy fartsy thing going on here that I don’t know about to not see it’s 5.0 or better greatness. This is definitely Clyde’s Movie Palace material if I ever get back to doing that gig.
Enough of that though. It’s very simple. Name the actress being charbroiled, and the name of this legendary movie. The prize? There isn’t one. Not unless this blog starts filling my pocketbook with a big influx of cash and that hasn’t happened in the ten years it’s been here. But it’ll make you feel smarter than anybody else so that’s your reward. ![]()
![]()
Thursday, October 27, 2016
Clyde’s Movie Picture Show Quick Quiz 101.0
Thursday, August 28, 2014
Are You Going to Sit Through Two Nights of Houdini?
While I realize that this is only one review, Houdini starring Adrien Brody, in no way shape or form sounds like anything that I would like to sit through for two nights in a row. I don't know if you've ever seen the Hollywoodized version from 1953 starring Tony Curtis and Janet Leigh but I'll take it any day of the week over this mind-boggling heavy-handed psychobabble claptrap.
Yes, I know the Curtis version is highly fictionalized but when I watch a movie about a famous magician I want to be entertained. If I want to see someone psychoanalyzed, I watch The Sopranos.
And if I want to see Adrien Brody, I put in my Blu-ray of King Kong.
Brody represents a casting coup of sorts for the producers and History, but almost from the opening moments, there’s a grating aspect to the film, as if this were the first bio about an overachiever with mommy issues. Perhaps that’s because Houdini, in monotonous voiceover, insists on analyzing what motivated him: “Unlike other people, I don’t escape life; I escape.” (A veteran screenwriter, Meyer’s adaptation is based on a book published by his father, Bernard C. Meyer, in the 1970s.)Yes I do realize that there were two other versions of Houdini. One of them starred that Starsky fellow (Paul Michael Glaser) without Hutch and costarred Archie Bunker's daughter Gloria Stivic (Sally Struthers). But one of my exes was a devout Starsky and Hutch fan, and rammed it down my throat every chance she got. So I cannot be objective in regards to Starsky's Hutchless Houdini. However, I might record it and watch Mr. Brody in the future sometime between now and the next decade. If I’m not doing anything important. You know, like living.
Nor is there much supporting help for Brody, with Kristen Connolly coming off as a nag playing Houdini’s perpetually concerned wife, Evan Jones as the architect behind his many tricks, and practically no one else registering.
Leaping about in time, the movie chronicles Harry Houdini’s upbringing as Ehrich Weiss, a Jewish immigrant from Budapest (where, incidentally, the miniseries was shot), parlaying his early love of magic into a stage act that eventually made him one of the most recognizable figures of his era. Along the way, the project takes detours to chronicle some of the other historical figures Houdini encountered, which included using that access to spy on behalf of the Americans and British before World War I.
The mini’s second half, meanwhile (after the most anticlimactic opening-night cliffhanger imaginable), focuses squarely on Houdini’s determination to contact his beloved and departed mother (Eszter Onodi), leading to the war on mediums he conducted, branding them psychics and frauds. That prompts an unexpected run-in with Sherlock Holmes creator Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, whose wife claimed she could patch Houdini in to the great beyond.
Update: Here’s another opinion from Roger Ebert’s leftover movie review web site. It’s not any better.
There’s just way too much filler between those moments of passion. Speaking of passion, Brody and Kristen Connolly, as his put-upon wife who was more of an assistant than a partner, have zero chemistry, although it’s not really the fault of the charming “House of Cards” star as much as the screenwriters who gave her no character with which to work. Again, it comes back to the writing. When Houdini and wife argue about how she's putting him in a box in their marriage and she says “You’re only happy in a box!,” even the most forgiving of melodrama fans will roll their eyes.OUCH!
